Fairbanks Co. v. Kirk
12 Pa. Super. 210, 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 221
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 17, 1900·No. Appeal, No. 141·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
The earnest argument of the counsel for the appellant has not convinced us that error was committed in this case. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below upon the opinion therein filed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fairbanks Co. v. Kirk, 12 Pa. Super. 210, 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 221 (Pa. Ct. App. 1900).
12 Pa. Super. 210 (Fairbanks Co. v. Kirk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Philadelphia v. Cumberland County Board of Assessment Appeals
18 A.3d 421 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Burcik v. Caplen
805 A.2d 21 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)
Danchison v. Ryon
88 Pa. D. & C. 129 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1954)
Commonwealth v. Mooney
92 A.2d 258 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1952)
Commonwealth v. Caughey
76 Pa. D. & C. 305 (Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas, 1950)
Commonwealth v. Dougherty
44 Pa. D. & C. 305 (Philadelphia County Municipal Court, 1942)
Keystone State Corp. v. Union Indemnity Co.
43 Pa. D. & C. 69 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1941)
Winnemore v. Philadelphia
18 Pa. Super. 625 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)