Fairbanks Capital Corp. v. Ziol

808 So. 2d 1268, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2362, 2002 WL 342055
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 6, 2002·No. No. 4D01-3021·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion to vacate doesn’t show on its face that it is entitled to relief as a matter of law. We, accordingly, affirm the trial court’s order of dismissal.

AFFIRMED.

STONE, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairbanks Capital Corp. v. Ziol, 808 So. 2d 1268, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2362, 2002 WL 342055 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

808 So. 2d 1268 (Fairbanks Capital Corp. v. Ziol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knight Ridder, Inc. v. Dade Aviation Consultants
808 So. 2d 1268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)