Fair v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
58 S.E. 492, 2 Ga. App. 376, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 374
Opinion
Unless the judgment rendered is absolutely demanded by the evidence, the first grant of a new trial on certiorari will not be interfered with. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fair v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 58 S.E. 492, 2 Ga. App. 376, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 374 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).
58 S.E. 492 (Fair v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tomberlin v. Barber
101 S.E. 196 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Halliburton v. Harshfield Bros.
78 S.E. 49 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Rowland v. Bell
76 S.E. 995 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Freeman v. Maxwell Furniture Co.
73 S.E. 349 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Loftin v. Great Southern Home Benevolent Ass'n
70 S.E. 353 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
King Bros. v. Turner
65 S.E. 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Fair v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
5 Ga. App. 708 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Brown & Bigelow v. Parian Paint Co.
62 S.E. 95 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)