Fair v. City of Birmingham

586 So. 2d 259, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1210, 1991 WL 181918
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fair v. City of Birmingham. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1038
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided July 26, 1991·No. CR 90-132·Published

Opinion

ON RETURN TO REMAND

TAYLOR, Judge.

On return to remand the trial court has submitted the following order:

“Per order of the Court of Criminal Appeals the undersigned has endeavored to hold an evidentiary hearing to resolve the two issues posed by the Court of Criminal Appeals [in its opinion],
“Upon consultation with the respective attorneys it is clear that neither of the issues can be resolved with any degree of certainty, moreover, that the proper remedy is to order a new trial in the above referenced matter, thus, the conviction in the trial court is set aside and a new trial ordered.”

There is nothing further for this court to consider, and we therefore dismiss this appeal.

OPINION EXTENDED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fair v. City of Birmingham, 586 So. 2d 259, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1210, 1991 WL 181918 (Ala. Ct. App. 1991).

586 So. 2d 259 (Fair v. City of Birmingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.