Fair Shake Realty Corp. v. Mayone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fair Shake Realty Corp. v. Mayone

67 A.D.2d 1034, 413 N.Y.S.2d 490, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10841

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 8, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 67 A.D.2d 1034 (Fair Shake Realty Corp. v. Mayone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fair Shake Realty Corp. v. Mayone, 67 A.D.2d 1034, 413 N.Y.S.2d 490, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered September 20, 1977 in Greene County, upon a verdict rendered at a Trial Term in favor of plaintiff. The record contains ample evidence to support the jury determination that the plaintiff was entitled to a commission of $23,000 from the appellant, and, accordingly, the plaintiff proved its cause of action. The jury could readily find that after the broker had brought the appellant and buyer together, the appellant entered into private negotiations which resulted in a sale on substantially the same terms as originally contemplated. We find no error in the court’s charge as to damages or its use of the word "business”. Judgment affirmed, with costs against the appellant. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr. and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered September 20, 1977 in Greene County, upon a verdict rendered at a Trial Term in favor of plaintiff. The record contains ample evidence to support the jury determination that the plaintiff was entitled to a commission of $23,000 from the appellant, and, accordingly, the plaintiff proved its cause of action. The jury could readily find that after the broker had brought the appellant and buyer together, the appellant entered into private negotiations which resulted in a sale on substantially the same terms as originally contemplated. We find no error in the court’s charge as to damages or its use of the word "business”. Judgment affirmed, with costs against the appellant. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr. and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.D.2d 1034, 413 N.Y.S.2d 490, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fair-shake-realty-corp-v-mayone-nyappdiv-1979.