Faintuck v. Oakland County Treasurer

226 N.W.2d 89, 57 Mich. App. 141, 1974 Mich. App. LEXIS 676
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Faintuck v. Oakland County Treasurer. Read the opinion of the Court — 53 Mich. App. 581
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided May 30, 1974·No. Docket No. 17427·Published

Opinion

Supplemental Opinion

Quinn, J.

Rehearing granted.

The original opinion in this case is found at 53 Mich App 581; 219 NW2d 810 (1974). That opinion is incorrect because of an erroneous concession by both counsel at oral argument that neither indigent defendant was assessed a fine or costs by the district court. An application for rehearing asserted that each defendant was fined and assessed costs. Examination of the district court records discloses that each defendant was fined $25 and assessed costs of $29.

Applying Supreme Court administrative order no. 1972-4, 387 Mich xxx (1972), and MCLA 600.8379; MSA 27A.8379 to the corrected facts, if necessary, a writ of mandamus shall issue requiring the Oakland County Treasurer to pay $46 of the $100 attorney fee ordered in the case of each indigent defendant. A similar writ shall issue, if necessary, requiring the Southfield City Treasurer to pay $54 of each $100 attorney fee.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Faintuck v. Oakland County Treasurer, 226 N.W.2d 89, 57 Mich. App. 141, 1974 Mich. App. LEXIS 676 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974).

226 N.W.2d 89 (Faintuck v. Oakland County Treasurer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Faintuck v. Oakland County Treasurer
219 N.W.2d 810 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1974)