Fain v. Hughes

33 S.E. 1012, 108 Ga. 537, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 290
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 27, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 33 S.E. 1012 (Fain v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fain v. Hughes, 33 S.E. 1012, 108 Ga. 537, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 290 (Ga. 1899).

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

An equitable petition was filed in the superior court of Union county, by A. A. Fain, administrator of M. M. Fain, and by John England, against T. C. Hughes and M. G. Hamby, executors of T. M. Hughes. The defendants filed a plea of res adjudicata, and the case was submitted to the presiding judge for determination without the intervention of a jury. The defendants introduced in evidence the record of a former equitable proceeding which had been instituted by the same plaintiffs against the same defendants, and showed that this action had been dismissed upon a general demurrer for want of equity. A comparison of the two petitions dis[538]*538closes that they undertake to set forth identically the same cause of action. It is true that the last petition prays for certain relief to which no reference was made in the first petition; but the right, if any, to such additional relief is based upon the precise state of facts set forth in the petition filed in the first instance. In sustaining the demurrer to that petition, the court adjudicated solemnly and finally that the plaintiffs had no cause of action and were not entitled to relief of any kind. This case, therefore, is controlled by section 3744 of the Civil Code, which declares that: “If upon demurrer the court has decided upon the merits of the cause, the judgment may be pleaded in bar of another suit for the same cause.” Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the court below sustaining the plea of res adjudicata.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Madison, Ltd. v. Price
247 S.E.2d 523 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Ritchie Gas of Cornelia, Inc. v. Ferguson
140 S.E.2d 925 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Smith v. Bank of Acworth
140 S.E.2d 889 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)
Atlanta Newspapers, Inc. v. Tyler
122 S.E.2d 591 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Keith v. Darby
122 S.E.2d 463 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Northern Assurance Co. v. Almand
78 S.E.2d 783 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Almand v. Northern Assurance Co.
77 S.E.2d 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Owens v. Williams
73 S.E.2d 512 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Stanton v. Gailey
33 S.E.2d 747 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
Hadden v. Fuqua
16 S.E.2d 737 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Redwine v. Frizzell
197 S.E. 805 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Sudderth v. Harris
181 S.E. 122 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Blankenship v. Johnston
170 S.E. 92 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
McDonald Mortgage & Realty Co. v. Feingold
149 S.E. 132 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)
Kohn v. Colonial Hill Co.
144 S.E. 33 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Kennedy v. Ayers
142 S.E. 859 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Hill v. Armour Fertilizer Works
93 S.E. 511 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Moor v. Farlinger
75 S.E. 423 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Wolfe v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.
65 S.E. 62 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Smith v. Smith
54 S.E. 73 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 S.E. 1012, 108 Ga. 537, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fain-v-hughes-ga-1899.