Fain & Stamps v. Shy & Co.
42 S.E. 94, 115 Ga. 765, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 574
Opinion
There being no proper answer to the writ of certiorari, and no motion looking to the obtaining of such an answer, there was no error in dismissing the petition for the writ.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fain & Stamps v. Shy & Co., 42 S.E. 94, 115 Ga. 765, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 574 (Ga. 1902).
42 S.E. 94 (Fain & Stamps v. Shy & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ultra Group of Companies, Inc. v. Inam International, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2020
City of Atlanta v. Schaffer
264 S.E.2d 6 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)
Norris v. Sibert & Robinson
186 S.E. 199 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Mertins v. Gavalos
111 S.E. 684 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Lovelady
80 S.E. 725 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Sutton v. State
48 S.E. 342 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)