Fain & Stamps v. Shy & Co.
42 S.E. 94, 115 Ga. 765, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 574
This text of 42 S.E. 94 (Fain & Stamps v. Shy & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fain & Stamps v. Shy & Co., 42 S.E. 94, 115 Ga. 765, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 574 (Ga. 1902).
Opinion
There being no proper answer to the writ of certiorari, and no motion looking to the obtaining of such an answer, there was no error in dismissing the petition for the writ.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ultra Group of Companies, Inc. v. Inam International, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2020
City of Atlanta v. Schaffer
264 S.E.2d 6 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)
Norris v. Sibert & Robinson
186 S.E. 199 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Mertins v. Gavalos
111 S.E. 684 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Lovelady
80 S.E. 725 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Sutton v. State
48 S.E. 342 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
42 S.E. 94, 115 Ga. 765, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fain-stamps-v-shy-co-ga-1902.