Faichney v. Ketelsen

250 A.D. 868, 295 N.Y.S. 246, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9487
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 26, 1937·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Action to recover damages for injuries to the infant plaintiff as a result of having been struck by the automobile of one of the defendants, and by his father to recover for loss of services. Judgment and order denying motion to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event. Appeal from order denying motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence dismissed. It was error to charge that crossing a street at a place other [869]*869than a street intersection is of itself evidence of negligerice. Although no exception was taken, the interests of substantial justice require that there should be a new trial. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Faichney v. Ketelsen, 250 A.D. 868, 295 N.Y.S. 246, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9487 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

250 A.D. 868 (Faichney v. Ketelsen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Streickler v. City of New York
15 A.D.2d 927 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Chandler v. Keene
5 A.D.2d 42 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Kelly v. Manhattan & Queens Traction Corp.
253 A.D. 836 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)