Fahrni v. County of Tulare
This text of Fahrni v. County of Tulare (Fahrni v. County of Tulare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
11 TIFFANY FAHRNI, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-01265-KES-SAB
12 Plaintiffs, ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS IN THIS MATTER AGAINST DEFENDANT 13 v. WELLPATH, LLC PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 362 14 COUNTY OF TULARE, et al., ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS TO 15 Defendants. FILE STATUS REPORT
16 (ECF No. 46)
17 FIFTEEN DAY DEADLINE
18 Plaintiffs filed this action on August 23, 2023. (ECF No. 1) The operative first amended 19 complaint asserts claims against Defendants: (1) County of Tulare; (2) Precision Psychiatric 20 Services, Inc.; (3) Anthony Ceja; (4) Sureshbabu Kurra; (5) Adolfo Gallardo, Jr.; (6) Salvador 21 Santillan; (7) Anyval Suarez; (8) Wellpath, LLC (“Wellpath”); and (9) Alla Liberstein, MD. 22 (ECF No. 29.) The initial scheduling conference was held on December 5, 2023. (ECF No. 24.) 23 Neither the pretrial conference nor trial have been set in this matter. 24 On November 15, 2024, Defendant Wellpath filed a suggestion of bankruptcy and notice 25 of stay indicating that on November 11, 2024, Wellpath filed for bankruptcy in the United States 26 Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (Houston Division) for relief under chapter 27 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). (ECF No. 46.) The 1 bankruptcy case is pending under case number 24-90563-(ARP). 2 Pursuant to Section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code, all actions against a defendant who has 3 filed a bankruptcy petition are automatically stayed once the petition is filed. 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) 4 (staying “the commencement or continuation, including the issuance or employment of process, 5 of a judicial, administrative, or other action or proceeding against the debtor that was or could 6 have been commenced before the commencement of the case under this title, or to recover a 7 claim against the debtor that arose before the commencement of the case under this title.”); see 8 also Sternberg v. Johnston, 595 F.3d 937, 943 (9th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, all proceedings in 9 this matter against Defendant Wellpath shall be stayed pursuant to Section 362(a) of Title 11, 10 United States Code. 11 As noted above, no pretrial conference or trial has been set in this action. The Court 12 tentatively orders a stay of this action against Wellpath only and that the action proceed against 13 the other eight defendants. The Court shall order the parties not subject to the automatic stay to 14 file a status report within fifteen (15) days indicating whether this action should proceed in some 15 manner against any of the named Defendants or if this matter should be stayed in its entirety. 16 See Parker v. Bain, 68 F.3d 1131, 1137 (9th Cir. 1995) (“All proceedings in a single case are not 17 lumped together for purposes of automatic stay analysis. Even if the first claim filed in a case 18 was originally brought against the debtor, section 362 does not necessarily stay all other claims 19 in the case. Within a single case, some actions may be stayed, others not. Multiple claim and 20 multiple party litigation must be disaggregated so that particular claims, counterclaims, cross 21 claims and third-party claims are treated independently when determining which of their 22 respective proceedings are subject to the bankruptcy stay.” (quoting Maritime Elec. Co. v. 23 United Jersey Bank, 959 F.2d 1194, 1204–06 (3d Cir. 1992))). Alternatively, the Court is 24 available to conduct a status conference with the parties not subject to the automatic stay. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. All proceedings in this matter against Defendant Wellpath, LLC are STAYED 27 pursuant to Section 362(a) of Title 11, United States Code; 1 conclusion of the bankruptcy action; and 2 3. Within fifteen (15) days of service of this order, the parties shall request a status 3 conference or file a status report indicating whether this matter should be stayed 4 in its entirety and all matters vacated or whether a settlement conference should 5 be set. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. Se g | Dated: _ November 18, 2024 STANLEY A. BOONE 9 United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fahrni v. County of Tulare, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fahrni-v-county-of-tulare-caed-2024.