Fahringer v. State

134 N.W. 406, 148 Wis. 291, 1912 Wisc. LEXIS 63
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 30, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 134 N.W. 406 (Fahringer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fahringer v. State, 134 N.W. 406, 148 Wis. 291, 1912 Wisc. LEXIS 63 (Wis. 1912).

Opinion

Kerwin, J.

This is a writ of error to review a judgment of conviction for loaning money at a rate of interest above the legal rate. The plaintiff in error was convicted of the alleged crime of loaning money at usurious rates of interest, and sentenced to pay a fine of $25 and costs of suit and in. default be imprisoned.

The contention of the plaintiff in error is that sec. 1691, Stats. (Laws of 1907, ch. 412), creating the offense of which plaintiff in error was convicted, is unconstitutional and void.. The validity of this law is, as we understand the case, the only question involved upon this appeal. This question was settled by this court against the contention of plaintiff in error-in State ex rel. Ornstine v. Cary, 126 Wis. 135, 105 N. W. 192, and the doctrine underlying that decision reiterated in-later cases in this court. Therefore discussion of the question seems unnecessary.

By.the Court. — The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kelleher v. Minshull
119 P.2d 302 (Washington Supreme Court, 1941)
In re Murphy
134 N.W. 823 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 N.W. 406, 148 Wis. 291, 1912 Wisc. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fahringer-v-state-wis-1912.