Fahrenholz v. Security Mutual Insurance
13 A.D.3d 1087, 786 N.Y.S.2d 768, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16332
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fahrenholz v. Security Mutual Insurance. Read the opinion of the Court — 291 A.D.2d 876 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 2004·No. Appeal No. 2·Published
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Eugene M. Fahey, J.), entered March 30, 2004. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the cross motion of defendant Security Mutual Insurance Company to disqualify and remove plaintiffs counsel.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Fahrenholz v Security Mut. Ins. Co. (13 AD3d 1085 [2004]). Present—Green, J.P., Scudder, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fahrenholz v. Security Mutual Insurance, 13 A.D.3d 1087, 786 N.Y.S.2d 768, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16332 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).
13 A.D.3d 1087 (Fahrenholz v. Security Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fahrenholz v. Security Mutual Insurance
13 A.D.3d 1085 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)