Fahner v. United States

48 Cust. Ct. 340
United States Customs Court·Decided February 14, 1962·No. No. 66464; protest 60/28276(A) (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon yarn similar in use to thrown silk not more advanced than singles, tram, or organzine and following the principles set forth in United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fahner v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 340 (cusc 1962).

48 Cust. Ct. 340 (Fahner v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Steinberg Bros.
47 C.C.P.A. 47 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1959)