Fahey v. New York City Department of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fahey v. New York City Department of Education

16 A.D.3d 220, 790 N.Y.S.2d 868, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2489

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.3d 220 (Fahey v. New York City Department of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fahey v. New York City Department of Education, 16 A.D.3d 220, 790 N.Y.S.2d 868, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2489 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul G. Feinman, J.), entered March 23, 2004, which denied petitioner’s application, inter alia, to annul the unsatisfactory rating he received for the 2000/2001 academic year, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent’s determination to sustain the unsatisfactory performance evaluation was rationally based on administrative findings that petitioner twice corporally punished students during the 2000/2001 academic year (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 [1974]). The findings of corporal punish[221]*221ment were not undermined by the administrative relief that petitioner was accorded in grievance proceedings. We have considered the parties’ remaining contentions, including respondent’s claim the proceeding is time-barred, and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul G. Feinman, J.), entered March 23, 2004, which denied petitioner’s application, inter alia, to annul the unsatisfactory rating he received for the 2000/2001 academic year, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent’s determination to sustain the unsatisfactory performance evaluation was rationally based on administrative findings that petitioner twice corporally punished students during the 2000/2001 academic year (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 [1974]). The findings of corporal punish[221]*221ment were not undermined by the administrative relief that petitioner was accorded in grievance proceedings. We have considered the parties’ remaining contentions, including respondent’s claim the proceeding is time-barred, and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.3d 220, 790 N.Y.S.2d 868, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fahey-v-new-york-city-department-of-education-nyappdiv-2005.