Fahey v. Fahey
737 N.W.2d 697, 480 Mich. 860
Opinion
Jane C. FAHEY, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,
v.
William K. FAHEY, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 3, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to dismiss the application for leave to appeal is DENIED. The motion to stay reconsideration by the trial court is DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fahey v. Fahey, 737 N.W.2d 697, 480 Mich. 860 (Mich. 2007).
737 N.W.2d 697 (Fahey v. Fahey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.