Fahey v. Fahey
This text of 737 N.W.2d 697 (Fahey v. Fahey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jane C. FAHEY, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,
v.
William K. FAHEY, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 3, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to dismiss the application for leave to appeal is DENIED. The motion to stay reconsideration by the trial court is DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
737 N.W.2d 697, 480 Mich. 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fahey-v-fahey-mich-2007.