Fagot v. David

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Fagot v. David

2 Mart. 1

DecidedDecember 15, 1815

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Mart. 1 (Fagot v. David) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fagot v. David, 2 Mart. 1 (La. 1815).

Pincite

Opinion

Mathews, J.

delivered the opinion of the court. In this case there is no statement of facts [2]*2made and transmitted to this court, as required by law, nor any special verdict, and as no bill of exceptions was taken to any opinion of the judge in the court below, given during the progress of the trial, the exception which comes up with the record, being taken to a final judgment, is contrary to law and practice.

Turner for the plaintiff. Duncan for the defendant.

See Bujac & al. vs. Mayhew, 3 Martin, 613.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the appeal be dismissed, at the costs of the defendant and appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mathews, J.

delivered the opinion of the court. In this case there is no statement of facts [2]*2made and transmitted to this court, as required by law, nor any special verdict, and as no bill of exceptions was taken to any opinion of the judge in the court below, given during the progress of the trial, the exception which comes up with the record, being taken to a final judgment, is contrary to law and practice.

Turner for the plaintiff. Duncan for the defendant.

See Bujac & al. vs. Mayhew, 3 Martin, 613.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the appeal be dismissed, at the costs of the defendant and appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Mart. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fagot-v-david-la-1815.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack