Fagaragan v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fagaragan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Haw. 224
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided December 6, 2012·No. SCWC-11-0000592·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000592 06-DEC-2012 08:41 AM

SCWC-11-0000592

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

ERWIN E. FAGARAGAN, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000592; S.P.P. NO. 11-1-0005(1);

CR. NOS. 04-1-0595(1) & 05-1-0090(1))

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Erwin E. Fagaragan’s application for writ of certiorari filed on October 22, 2012, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 6, 2012.

Erwin E. Fagaragan, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald pro se, on the application /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Lisa M. Itomura Diane K. Taira /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. Deputy Attorneys General for Respondent-Appellee /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fagaragan v. State, (haw 2012).

Fagaragan v. State (Fagaragan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.