Fagan v. . Ulrich
119 N.E. 1055, 222 N.Y. 696, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1583
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fagan v. . Ulrich, 119 N.E. 1055, 222 N.Y. 696, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1583 (N.Y. 1918).
119 N.E. 1055 (Fagan v. . Ulrich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Allen v. Oscar G. Murray Railroad Employes' Benefit Fund
112 Misc. 156 (New York Supreme Court, 1920)