Fagan v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

97 A.D.2d 979, 468 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20827

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Sears Roebuck & Co. (Sears) and Acme Electric Corp. Defendant Globe Union, Inc., appeals from the same order dismissing Globe’s cross claim against Acme and Sears. Trial Term erroneously granted summary judgment to Sears and Acme. Questions of fact exist as to whether the failure to warn or adequately instruct was given and, if so, was it the proximate cause of the resulting explosion (Lancaster Silo & Block Co. v Northern Propane Gas Co., 75 AD2d 55; Wolfgruber v Upjohn Co., 72 AD2d 59, affd 52 NY2d 768). (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boehm, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fagan v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 97 A.D.2d 979, 468 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

97 A.D.2d 979 (Fagan v. Sears Roebuck & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wolfgruber v. Upjohn Co.
72 A.D.2d 59 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Wolfgruber v. Upjohn Co.
417 N.E.2d 1002 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Lancaster Silo & Block Co. v. Northern Propane Gas Co.
75 A.D.2d 55 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)