FAG Kugelfischer Georg Schafer AG v. United States

19 Ct. Int'l Trade 634
CourtUnited States Court of International Trade
DecidedMay 3, 1995
DocketCourt No. 95-03-00335
StatusPublished

This text of 19 Ct. Int'l Trade 634 (FAG Kugelfischer Georg Schafer AG v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
FAG Kugelfischer Georg Schafer AG v. United States, 19 Ct. Int'l Trade 634 (cit 1995).

Opinion

ORDER

Tsoucalas, Judge:

Upon consideration of the consent Motion of Plaintiffs FAG Kugelfischer Georg Schafer AG, FAG Italia S.p.A. and FAG Bearings Corporation for expedited remand to correct ministerial errors and the entire record herein, it is hereby

Ordered that plaintiffs motion is granted; and it is further

Ordered that the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (“ITA”) is directed to correct, for FAG Germany and FAG Italy, the ministerial errors enumerated below contained in the Final Results of the fourth administrative review of antifriction bearings (other than tapered roller bearings) and parts thereof, published as Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof from France, et al. Final Results of Antidunping Duty Administrative Reviews, Partial Termination of Administrative Reviews, and Revocation inPartof an Antidumping Duty Orders, 60FR10900,10959 (February 28, 1995):

1. For FAG Germany, calculate a profit on sales to related parties that failed the arm’s-length test and compare this profit to the profit on sales to unrelated parties; where profit on related party sales is not significantly less than profit on unrelated party sales, Commerce is directed to base profit on all sales of the same class or kind (including related party sales) as reported by FAG Germany on the record;
2. In the calculation of CVprofit for FAG Germany, deduct certain home market expenses (which are not included in the total cost of production (COP)) from net unit price (ADJPRICE), as calculated at line 37 of FAG Germany’s SAS program. Amend line 37 as follows:
37: ADJPRICE=UNITPRH+OTHEREVH-QTYDISH-OTHDISH1-REBATEH-PACKMH-PACKLH-DINLFRH-DININSH-VWARSRH-PAYTHIH-OTHDISH2-DPRSFRH;
3. With respect to FAG Germany, add other revenue (OTHER-EVE) to the reported unit price (UNITPRE) prior to applying the BIA rate to UNITPRE. Amend line 128 as follows:
128: REBATEE=REBATEE+((UNITPRE+OTHEREVE) *0.085);
4. With respect to FAG Germany and FAG Italy, remove 1993 sales made to the one U.S. customer for whom corporate rebates were reported (as identified in Exhibit 1 at line 127 (Germany) and line 161 (Italy) prior to applying the BIA rate to 1993 sales for those customers who received corporate rebates in 1992; and it is further

[635]*635Ordered that ITA shall publish amended Final Results incorporating these corrections in the Federal Register within thirty (30) days of the entry of this order; and it is further

Ordered that all parties to this action are granted leave to file amended complaints to take into account any changes in the final results resulting from the ITA’s actions pursuant to this Order, within thirty (30) days of the publication of the amended final results.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Ct. Int'l Trade 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fag-kugelfischer-georg-schafer-ag-v-united-states-cit-1995.