Faery v. Piedmont

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Faery v. Piedmont

181 A.D.2d 1014, 582 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4610

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 181 A.D.2d 1014 (Faery v. Piedmont) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Faery v. Piedmont, 181 A.D.2d 1014, 582 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4610 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order of Family Court denying her objections to a Hearing Examiner’s order that dismissed her petition for upward modification of child support. The court did not err. Although petitioner showed some increase in respondent’s income, as well as in her own, she failed to show that the needs of the child were not being met (see, Matter of Brescia v Fitts, 56 NY2d 132; cf., Matter of Michaels v Michaels, 56 NY2d 924). Her financial [1015]*1015statement showed the child’s expenses as $200 per month and respondent has been paying $60 per week pursuant to the agreement incorporated in the judgment of divorce. (Appeal from Order of Niagara County Family Court, Halpin, J.— Child Support.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Davis and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order of Family Court denying her objections to a Hearing Examiner’s order that dismissed her petition for upward modification of child support. The court did not err. Although petitioner showed some increase in respondent’s income, as well as in her own, she failed to show that the needs of the child were not being met (see, Matter of Brescia v Fitts, 56 NY2d 132; cf., Matter of Michaels v Michaels, 56 NY2d 924). Her financial [1015]*1015statement showed the child’s expenses as $200 per month and respondent has been paying $60 per week pursuant to the agreement incorporated in the judgment of divorce. (Appeal from Order of Niagara County Family Court, Halpin, J.— Child Support.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Davis and Doerr, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 A.D.2d 1014, 582 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faery-v-piedmont-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack