Faendrick v. Allied Aviation Service International Corp.

284 A.D. 898, 134 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3994
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 18, 1954
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 284 A.D. 898 (Faendrick v. Allied Aviation Service International Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Faendrick v. Allied Aviation Service International Corp., 284 A.D. 898, 134 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3994 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff by reason of the alleged collapse of a metal stairway or platform supplied by the defendant, the latter appeals from an order granting plaintiff’s motion for discovery and inspection, which order provides “that in the event said platform or staircase mentioned in the complaint has been disposed of that the defendant furnish to the plaintiff any reports of inspection or examination they may have to indicate the condition of the said platform or staircase after the occurrence.” Defendant also appeals from an order granting its motion for reargument which, upon such reargument, adhered to the original decision. Order on reargument modified by striking out the last ordering paragraph and by substituting therefor a provision denying plaintiff’s motion. As so modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. Appeal from original order dismissed, without costs. It is conceded that defendant sold as scrap the stairway involved in the accident shortly after the accident and can no longer produce it for inspection. “ Documents, to be subject to inspection, must relate to the merits of the action or defense and themselves be evidence.” (People ex rel. Mergenthaler Linotype Go. V. Mills, 273 App. Div. 860; Ehrlich v. New York Central B. B. Go., 251 App. Div. 721.) The reports sought here are not shown to be admissible in evidence. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Falcone v. Repetti
61 Misc. 2d 407 (New York Supreme Court, 1969)
Padilla v. Damascus
16 A.D.2d 71 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Brecht v. City of New York
14 A.D.2d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Pfaudler Permutit, Inc. v. Stanley Steel Service Corp.
28 Misc. 2d 388 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Beyer v. Keller
11 A.D.2d 426 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Bassney v. Erie Railroad
24 Misc. 2d 350 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Rizzuto v. Telesca
19 Misc. 2d 871 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Patchogue Oil Terminal Corp. v. Sambach
15 Misc. 2d 266 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Beasley v. Huntley Estates at Ardsley, Inc.
285 A.D. 887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
284 A.D. 898, 134 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faendrick-v-allied-aviation-service-international-corp-nyappdiv-1954.