Faeghi v. Dist. Ct. (The Foothills at S. Highlands Homeowners Ass'n.)

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided June 11, 2015·No. 67963·Unpublished

Opinion

court's finding that SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, had not approved the agreement beyond the expired deadline is supported by substantial evidence and is not clearly erroneous. Id. at 672-73, 119 P.3d at 1257; see NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we deny the petition. NRAP 21(b); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). It is so ORDERED.

J Saitta

J. Pickering

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Hawkins Melendrez, P.C. Charles L. Geisendorf, Ltd. Howard Kim & Associates Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 19474 7e97,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Faeghi v. Dist. Ct. (The Foothills at S. Highlands Homeowners Ass'n.), (Neb. 2015).

Faeghi v. Dist. Ct. (The Foothills at S. Highlands Homeowners Ass'n.) (Faeghi v. Dist. Ct. (The Foothills at S. Highlands Homeowners Ass'n.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related