Faeber v. Park-Rochester Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Faeber v. Park-Rochester Corp.

6 A.D.2d 1017, 178 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4750

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 29, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.2d 1017 (Faeber v. Park-Rochester Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Faeber v. Park-Rochester Corp., 6 A.D.2d 1017, 178 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4750 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from so much of an order on reargument as denied a motion for leave to amend the complaint. Order modified by striking from the ordering paragraph everything following the words “ upon reargument ” and by substituting therefor the words “the motion for leave to amend the complaint be and the same hereby is granted ”. As so modified, order insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs. Appellant should be allowed to allege that the place of the accident was a multiple dwelling and that she was not guilty of contributory negligence. Nolan, P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from so much of an order on reargument as denied a motion for leave to amend the complaint. Order modified by striking from the ordering paragraph everything following the words “ upon reargument ” and by substituting therefor the words “the motion for leave to amend the complaint be and the same hereby is granted ”. As so modified, order insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs. Appellant should be allowed to allege that the place of the accident was a multiple dwelling and that she was not guilty of contributory negligence. Nolan, P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.. concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.2d 1017, 178 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faeber-v-park-rochester-corp-nyappdiv-1958.