Fader v. Berrada
Opinion
1 2 3 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 KEVIN JOSEPH FADER, Case No. 21-5264-TSZ-TLF 7 Plaintiff, v. ORDER SETTING AMENDED DRISS BERRADA, 9 Defendant. 10
11 This matter comes before the Court on the Court’s Order Adopting Report and 12 Recommendation. Dkt. 24. The Court has referred this matter to the undersigned for 13 further proceedings. Dkt. 24. 14 The Court sets the following deadline for plaintiff to file an amended complaint to 15 cure, if possible, the deficiencies in the complaint identified in the Court’s previous 16 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 23) and the Court’s Order Adopting Report and 17 Recommendation (Dkt. 24): February 4, 2022. 18 If an amended complaint is filed, it must be legibly written or retyped in its entirety 19 and contain the same case number. Any cause of action alleged in the original 20 complaint that is not alleged in the amended complaint is waived. Forsyth v. Humana, 21 Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1474 (9th Cir. 1997), overruled in part on other grounds, Lacey v. 22 Maricopa Cnty., 693 F.3d 896 (9th Cir. 2012). If plaintiff files an amended complaint, the 23 Court will screen plaintiff’s complaint and address any other remaining referred issues. 24 1 The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to the parties in this action. 2 Dated this 4th day of January, 2022. 3 4 A 5 Theresa L. Fricke 6 United States Magistrate Judge
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fader v. Berrada (Fader v. Berrada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.