Faden v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Faden v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

656 So. 2d 592, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6807, 1995 WL 370697

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 23, 1995

DocketNo. 94-03165

StatusPublished

This text of 656 So. 2d 592 (Faden v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Faden v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 656 So. 2d 592, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6807, 1995 WL 370697 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jean Faden appeals the denial of her claim for unemployment benefits. The appeals referee found that appellant left her employment for good personal reasons but without good cause attributable to the employer. This finding of fact was adopted by the Unemployment Appeals Commission. The commission’s order is entitled to a presumption of correctness. We find no legal errors and appellant failed to show that the finding of ineligibility was not supported by competent, substantial evidence in the record. Therefore, because appellant left her job without good cause attributable to the employer, she is not eligible for unemployment benefits. See, e.g., Beard v. Dep’t of Commerce, 369 So.2d 382 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jean Faden appeals the denial of her claim for unemployment benefits. The appeals referee found that appellant left her employment for good personal reasons but without good cause attributable to the employer. This finding of fact was adopted by the Unemployment Appeals Commission. The commission’s order is entitled to a presumption of correctness. We find no legal errors and appellant failed to show that the finding of ineligibility was not supported by competent, substantial evidence in the record. Therefore, because appellant left her job without good cause attributable to the employer, she is not eligible for unemployment benefits. See, e.g., Beard v. Dep’t of Commerce, 369 So.2d 382 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

656 So. 2d 592, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6807, 1995 WL 370697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faden-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack