Factory Stores Company of Cleveland, a Corporation v. William R. McComb Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor

179 F.2d 238, 17 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 65,525
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 14, 1949
Docket10879_1
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 179 F.2d 238 (Factory Stores Company of Cleveland, a Corporation v. William R. McComb Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Factory Stores Company of Cleveland, a Corporation v. William R. McComb Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor, 179 F.2d 238, 17 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 65,525 (6th Cir. 1949).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard before this court on October 21, 1949, at which time it was suggested that, if a bill pending in Congress should be enacted, the appropriate course here would probably be to direct a remand of the cause to the District Court and that, accordingly, it might be well for the court to withhold decision until Congress should act upon the pending bill.

The pending bill referred to was enacted by Congress on October 26, 1949, being an amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act, Pub.No.393, 81st Cong., c. 736, 1st sess., 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.

On November 14, 1949, the appellee, William R. McComb, Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor, filed a motion to remand in view of the new factual elements and questions of law of vital importance presented by the 1949 amendments.

On November 22, 1949, the appellee, Factory Stores Company of Cleveland, joined in the motion of the appellant to remand the cause to the United States District Court for further procedure;

And it appearing that the joint motions are well grounded, it is ordered that the cause be remanded to the United States District Court for further proceedings and consideration under the 1949 amendments of the Fair Labor Standards Act. 81 F.Supp. 403.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hodgson v. ARA Services, Inc.
392 F. Supp. 1167 (W.D. Virginia, 1975)
Shultz v. Crotty Bros. Texas, Inc.
310 F. Supp. 761 (E.D. Texas, 1970)
Schultz v. Crotty Bros. Dallas, Inc.
304 F. Supp. 191 (W.D. Texas, 1969)
Wirtz v. Pickett Food Service, Inc.
304 F. Supp. 784 (D. New Mexico, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 F.2d 238, 17 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 65,525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/factory-stores-company-of-cleveland-a-corporation-v-william-r-mccomb-ca6-1949.