Façade Tech., LLC v. CNY Constr. 701 LLC

2021 NY Slip Op 07509, 200 A.D.3d 607, 155 N.Y.S.3d 783
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 28, 2021
DocketIndex No. 653587/19 Appeal No. 14904 Case No. 2020-04934
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 07509 (Façade Tech., LLC v. CNY Constr. 701 LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Façade Tech., LLC v. CNY Constr. 701 LLC, 2021 NY Slip Op 07509, 200 A.D.3d 607, 155 N.Y.S.3d 783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Façade Tech., LLC v CNY Constr. 701 LLC (2021 NY Slip Op 07509)
Fa‡ade Tech., LLC v CNY Constr. 701 LLC
2021 NY Slip Op 07509
Decided on December 28, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: December 28, 2021
Before: Kern, J.P., Moulton, Mendez, Shulman, Higgitt, JJ.

Index No. 653587/19 Appeal No. 14904 Case No. 2020-04934

[*1]FaÇade Technology, LLC, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v

CNY Construction 701 LLC, et al., Defendants-Respondents, CNY Group LLC, et al., Defendants.


Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman PC, New York (Jason A. Copley and Gary J. Repke, Jr. of counsel), for appellants.

Dreifuss Bonacci & Parker, PC, New York (JoAnne M. Bonacci of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barry R. Ostrager, J.), entered on or about November 18, 2020, which denied as untimely plaintiff's motion to maintain its seventh cause of action, to enforce a statutory trust, as a class action, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the matter remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Plaintiff's motion for class certification should not have been denied as untimely because plaintiff demonstrated good cause under CPLR 2004 for its brief, nonprejudicial delay in moving (see Gerard v Clermont York Assoc. LLC, 143 AD3d 478

[1st Dept 2016]; Galdamez v Biordi Constr. Corp., 50 AD3d 357 [1st Dept 2008]). Accordingly, we remand the matter for consideration of the merits of the motion. THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: December 28, 2021



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Padovani v. New York State Energy Research & Dev. Auth.
2025 NY Slip Op 51485(U) (New York Supreme Court, Schoharie County, 2025)
Ortega v. Skyworx Contr. Inc.
2023 NY Slip Op 05693 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 07509, 200 A.D.3d 607, 155 N.Y.S.3d 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/facade-tech-llc-v-cny-constr-701-llc-nyappdiv-2021.