Fabrizio v. Gallerano
This text of 4 A.2d 518 (Fabrizio v. Gallerano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are in accord with the conclusion reached by the learned vice-chancellor, and the decree is accordingly affirmed.
The bank account was a credit, and was therefore convertible “into money.” And, by the same clause, the testator gave the balance” of his “estate,” after the payment of administration expenses, to his sister Matilda.
Appellants “ask leave to reserve their right to apply for an allowance of costs and counsel fees.” We have concluded that they are not entitled to either costs or counsel fees; and the application is therefore denied.
For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Paekee, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heheb, Peeskie, Poetee, Heteield, Deae, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, Hague, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 A.2d 518, 125 N.J. Eq. 383, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fabrizio-v-gallerano-nj-1939.