Fabrizio, Radmin, Buskbaum & Co. v. Hendler & Murray, P. C.

216 A.D.2d 520, 628 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7067
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 26, 1995·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J.), dated December 17,1993, as struck their affirmative defense of lack of personal jurisdiction.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for a hearing to determine whether the plaintiff obtained personal jurisdiction over all of the defendants.

There are numerous issues of fact regarding service of process upon the defendants in this case. Thus, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion by failing to order a hearing to determine whether the plaintiff had obtained personal jurisdiction over all of the defendants (see, De Vore v Osborne, 78 AD2d 915). Thompson, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fabrizio, Radmin, Buskbaum & Co. v. Hendler & Murray, P. C., 216 A.D.2d 520, 628 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7067 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

216 A.D.2d 520 (Fabrizio, Radmin, Buskbaum & Co. v. Hendler & Murray, P. C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tadco Construction Corp. v. PERI Framework Systems, Inc.
460 F. Supp. 2d 408 (E.D. New York, 2006)
Thomas v. Maloney
289 A.D.2d 222 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)