Fabrikant v. Seley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fabrikant v. Seley

49 A.D.2d 861, 374 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11040

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 28, 1975·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Resettled judgment of Supreme Court, New York County, entered on February 18, 1975, unanimously affirmed. Plaintiffs-respondents and defendants-respondents shall recover of appellants one bill of $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. In view of the overwhelming evidence adduced establishing defendant Seley’s fault, including the uncontroverted testimony of the investigating police officer as to the location of the vehicles after the accident, the error, if any, in excluding certain alleged admissions by plaintiff Penny Fabrikant, would not have affected the eventual outcome of this case. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Resettled judgment of Supreme Court, New York County, entered on February 18, 1975, unanimously affirmed. Plaintiffs-respondents and defendants-respondents shall recover of appellants one bill of $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. In view of the overwhelming evidence adduced establishing defendant Seley’s fault, including the uncontroverted testimony of the investigating police officer as to the location of the vehicles after the accident, the error, if any, in excluding certain alleged admissions by plaintiff Penny Fabrikant, would not have affected the eventual outcome of this case. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Fabrikant v. Seley, 49 A.D.2d 861, 374 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11040 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

49 A.D.2d 861 (Fabrikant v. Seley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related