Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Fabrikant v. Seley

Fabrikant v. Seley

49 A.D.2d 861, 374 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11040
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 28, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 49 A.D.2d 861 (Fabrikant v. Seley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fabrikant v. Seley, 49 A.D.2d 861, 374 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11040 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

Resettled judgment of Supreme Court, New York County, entered on February 18, 1975, unanimously affirmed. Plaintiffs-respondents and defendants-respondents shall recover of appellants one bill of $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. In view of the overwhelming evidence adduced establishing defendant Seley’s fault, including the uncontroverted testimony of the investigating police officer as to the location of the vehicles after the accident, the error, if any, in excluding certain alleged admissions by plaintiff Penny Fabrikant, would not have affected the eventual outcome of this case. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manes v. Simpson
108 A.D.2d 914 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Disalvo v. Bortle
58 A.D.2d 997 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.2d 861, 374 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fabrikant-v-seley-nyappdiv-1975.