Fabricut, Inc. v. Keeney

North Dakota Court of Appeals

Fabricut, Inc. v. Keeney

429 N.W.2d 24, 1988 N.D. App. LEXIS 5, 1988 WL 95019

CourtNorth Dakota Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 17, 1988

DocketCiv. No. 870383CA

StatusPublished

This text of 429 N.W.2d 24 (Fabricut, Inc. v. Keeney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fabricut, Inc. v. Keeney, 429 N.W.2d 24, 1988 N.D. App. LEXIS 5, 1988 WL 95019 (N.D. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Thomas C. Keeney, appearing pro se, appeals from a summary judgment awarding the plaintiff, Fabricut, Inc., $710.09 which included interest, costs, and attorney fees in its action to collect a debt from Keeney and awarding the third-party defendant, Clifton C. Rodenburg, $350.00 in attorney fees. Keeney admitted that he owed Fabricut $541.09 for merchandise but claimed that he satisfied the debt when Fabricut’s attorney, Rodenburg, refused to accept a “sight draft” as payment for the debt.

We affirm the summary judgment pursuant to Rule 35.1(a)(1), (6), and (7), N.D.R. App.P. and Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Brakke, 417 N.W.2d 380 (N.D.1988). Pursuant to Rule 38, N.D.R.App.P., we award Fabricut double costs, as well as attorney fees in the amount of $150.00. See United Bank of Bismarck v. Young, 401 N.W.2d 517 (N.D.1987). On remand, the trial court is directed to modify the judgment accordingly.

GARAAS, C.J., and LARRY M. HATCH and WILLIAM M. BEEDE, District Judges, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Thomas C. Keeney, appearing pro se, appeals from a summary judgment awarding the plaintiff, Fabricut, Inc., $710.09 which included interest, costs, and attorney fees in its action to collect a debt from Keeney and awarding the third-party defendant, Clifton C. Rodenburg, $350.00 in attorney fees. Keeney admitted that he owed Fabricut $541.09 for merchandise but claimed that he satisfied the debt when Fabricut’s attorney, Rodenburg, refused to accept a “sight draft” as payment for the debt.

We affirm the summary judgment pursuant to Rule 35.1(a)(1), (6), and (7), N.D.R. App.P. and Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Brakke, 417 N.W.2d 380 (N.D.1988). Pursuant to Rule 38, N.D.R.App.P., we award Fabricut double costs, as well as attorney fees in the amount of $150.00. See United Bank of Bismarck v. Young, 401 N.W.2d 517 (N.D.1987). On remand, the trial court is directed to modify the judgment accordingly.

GARAAS, C.J., and LARRY M. HATCH and WILLIAM M. BEEDE, District Judges, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

429 N.W.2d 24, 1988 N.D. App. LEXIS 5, 1988 WL 95019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fabricut-inc-v-keeney-ndctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack