Fabrica de Fideos Rivoli, S.A. v. Famex Investments Ltd.

225 So. 3d 312, 2017 WL 3044673, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10419, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1619
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 19, 2017·No. No. 3D17-10·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Fabrica de Fideos Rivoli, S.A., the defendant below, appeals a non-final order denying its motion to dismiss the instant action for lack of personal jurisdiction. Concluding that the trial court correctly applied the two-prong test for determining whether personal jurisdiction may be exercised over a nonresident defendant, we affirm. See Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499, 502 (Fla. 1989) (providing that personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant exists where: (1) the complaint alleges sufficient jurisdictional facts to satisfy Florida’s long-arm statute, section 48.193 of the Florida Statutes; and (2) the nonresident defendant has sufficient minimum contacts with Florida to satisfy constitutional due process concerns).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fabrica de Fideos Rivoli, S.A. v. Famex Investments Ltd., 225 So. 3d 312, 2017 WL 3044673, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10419, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1619 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

225 So. 3d 312 (Fabrica de Fideos Rivoli, S.A. v. Famex Investments Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related