Fabrica de Fideos Rivoli, S.A. v. Famex Investments Ltd.
This text of 225 So. 3d 312 (Fabrica de Fideos Rivoli, S.A. v. Famex Investments Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fabrica de Fideos Rivoli, S.A., the defendant below, appeals a non-final order denying its motion to dismiss the instant action for lack of personal jurisdiction. Concluding that the trial court correctly applied the two-prong test for determining whether personal jurisdiction may be exercised over a nonresident defendant, we affirm. See Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499, 502 (Fla. 1989) (providing that personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant exists where: (1) the complaint alleges sufficient jurisdictional facts to satisfy Florida’s long-arm statute, section 48.193 of the Florida Statutes; and (2) the nonresident defendant has sufficient minimum contacts with Florida to satisfy constitutional due process concerns).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 So. 3d 312, 2017 WL 3044673, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10419, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fabrica-de-fideos-rivoli-sa-v-famex-investments-ltd-fladistctapp-2017.