Fabregas v. Fernandez

215 So. 3d 111, 2017 WL 697686, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2352
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 22, 2017·No. No. 3D16-681·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 90.104(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2016); Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass’n v. Robbins, 914 So.2d 925 (Fla. 2005) (holding that in order to be preserved for appellate review, issue must be presented to lower court and the specific legal argument raised); Dade Cty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 781 So.2d 638 (Fla. 1999) (holding that, generally, a claim not raised in the trial court will not be considered on appeal).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fabregas v. Fernandez, 215 So. 3d 111, 2017 WL 697686, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2352 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

215 So. 3d 111 (Fabregas v. Fernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cadavieco v. Castle Key Ins. Co.
246 So. 3d 501 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)