Fabregas v. Fernandez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fabregas v. Fernandez

215 So. 3d 111, 2017 WL 697686, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2352

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 22, 2017

DocketNo. 3D16-681

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 215 So. 3d 111 (Fabregas v. Fernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fabregas v. Fernandez, 215 So. 3d 111, 2017 WL 697686, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2352 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 90.104(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2016); Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass’n v. Robbins, 914 So.2d 925 (Fla. 2005) (holding that in order to be preserved for appellate review, issue must be presented to lower court and the specific legal argument raised); Dade Cty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 781 So.2d 638 (Fla. 1999) (holding that, generally, a claim not raised in the trial court will not be considered on appeal).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 90.104(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2016); Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass’n v. Robbins, 914 So.2d 925 (Fla. 2005) (holding that in order to be preserved for appellate review, issue must be presented to lower court and the specific legal argument raised); Dade Cty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 781 So.2d 638 (Fla. 1999) (holding that, generally, a claim not raised in the trial court will not be considered on appeal).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 So. 3d 111, 2017 WL 697686, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fabregas-v-fernandez-fladistctapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack