Fabian Thomas v. Denise Daniel

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 24, 2012·No. 02-12-00038-CV·Published

Opinion

02-12-038-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00038-CV

Fabian Thomas

APPELLANT

V.

Denise Daniel

APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 431st District Court OF Denton COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

          On April 9, 2012, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2).  See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2).  We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and provided this court with proof of payment.

          Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  May 24, 2012 




[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fabian Thomas v. Denise Daniel, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Fabian Thomas v. Denise Daniel (Fabian Thomas v. Denise Daniel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.