Fabian Ignacio Faz Flores v. State
This text of Fabian Ignacio Faz Flores v. State (Fabian Ignacio Faz Flores v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-16-00439-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
FABIAN IGNACIO FAZ FLORES, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.
ORDER Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Contreras and Benavides Order Per Curiam
This cause is currently before the Court on appellant's motion to abate deadlines
for filing the brief until thirty days after a complete and correct appellate record is filed.
The clerk’s record was filed on October 25, 2016. The reporter’s record consisting of
seventeen volumes was filed on March 20, 2017 and appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed thirty days thereafter. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). The trial court issued an
order substituting retained counsel for appellant on April 3, 2017. Appellant has
requested and this Court has granted appellant five extensions of time to file the brief.
On December 12, 2017, we ordered counsel to file the brief on or before January 2, 2018
and notified counsel that no further extensions would be granted absent exigent
circumstances.
Counsel has now filed a motion to abate the deadlines for filing appellant’s brief
until a corrected reporter’s record is filed and a corrected clerk’s record is filed. According
to the motion, counsel is unable to cut and paste portions of the reporter’s record because
“something is wrong with the format settings used to make each pdf volume of the
reporter’s record.” Counsel states the clerk’s record is deficient because it does not
contain sequential page numbers. Counsel requests this Court to order the court
reporter and trial court clerk to file corrected records.
Our review of the reporter’s record indicates that the record is in pdf format and is
in compliance with the Rules of Appellate Procedure 34.6 and 35 and the Uniform Format
Manual for Texas Reporters’ Records. Our review of the clerk’s record filed on October
25, 2016 indicates that page numbering is missing; however, this defect was remedied
when a corrected clerk’s record containing page numbers was filed on January 9, 2018.
The appellate record is now complete and properly filed. Accordingly, we DENY
appellant’s request to order the court reporter and trial court clerk to file corrected records.
We similarly DENY Counsel’s motion to abate all deadlines for filing the opening brief until
thirty days after the corrected records are filed.
2 We are cognizant that the appellate record for this appeal is voluminous and that
counsel indicates he is having difficulty in utilizing portions of the reporter’s record for
purposes of preparing the brief. The Court, having fully examined and considered
appellant’s motion and the extensions previously granted in this cause, is of the opinion
that, in the interest of justice, the appellant’s deadline to file the brief in this case should
be extended one final time. Accordingly, the Honorable Joseph A. Connors III is
ORDERED to file the brief on or before February 26, 2018.
Under these circumstances and in order to effectuate the proper and complete
presentation of this appeal to the Court, we ABATE this appeal and remove it from the
Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated when the appellant’s brief has been
properly and duly filed.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 22nd day of January, 2018.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fabian Ignacio Faz Flores v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fabian-ignacio-faz-flores-v-state-texapp-2018.