Fabian A. Thomas v. Denise Daniel
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-11-00371-CV
FABIAN A. THOMAS APPELLANT
V.
DENISE DANIEL APPELLEE
------------
FROM THE 431ST DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
We have considered “Defendant's Motion For Non-Suit” filed by appellant,
which we construe as a motion to dismiss the appeal under rule 42.1(a)(1). It is
the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the
appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution
issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: December 15, 2011
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fabian A. Thomas v. Denise Daniel (Fabian A. Thomas v. Denise Daniel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.