Fabens v. Atchison & Nebraska Railroad

61 N.W. 99, 43 Neb. 74, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 532
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 5, 1894
DocketNo. 5714
StatusPublished

This text of 61 N.W. 99 (Fabens v. Atchison & Nebraska Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fabens v. Atchison & Nebraska Railroad, 61 N.W. 99, 43 Neb. 74, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 532 (Neb. 1894).

Opinion

Eyan, C.

The lots involved in this controversy were appropriated by the Atchison & Nebraska Eailroad Company in 1872, —the damages having been duly ascertained and paid. [75]*75This action was brought in the district court of Lancaster county by the former owner of said lots, by whom it was averred that by non-user the rights of said railroad company and its grantee had been lost, whereby plaintiff became absolute owner, and he accordingly prayed that his title might be quieted. After issues had been joined, a stipulation of facts was filed, which left to be determined but one question of fact, and that was whether or not there had been a non-user of the right of way of the defendants during the period which intervened between the condemnation proceedings and the commencement of this action. Upon conflicting evidence, which certainly did not preponderate in favor of plaintiff, there was a finding and decree in favor of the defendants. Under these circumstances the judgment of the district court must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 N.W. 99, 43 Neb. 74, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fabens-v-atchison-nebraska-railroad-neb-1894.