Faatz v. Forsythe

Utah Supreme Court

Faatz v. Forsythe

607 P.2d 843, 1980 Utah LEXIS 879

CourtUtah Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 27, 1980

DocketNo. 16379

StatusPublished

This text of 607 P.2d 843 (Faatz v. Forsythe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Faatz v. Forsythe, 607 P.2d 843, 1980 Utah LEXIS 879 (Utah 1980).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from that portion of a judgment of the District Court, Sevier County, which awarded plaintiff $755.25. A recitation of the facts would not be illuminating. The sole contention on appeal, in essence, relates to plaintiff’s claim that the findings are not supported by the evidence. We disagree. A review of the record shows that these findings and, hence, the judgment are supported by credible, substantial evidence.

Affirmed. Costs to plaintiffs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from that portion of a judgment of the District Court, Sevier County, which awarded plaintiff $755.25. A recitation of the facts would not be illuminating. The sole contention on appeal, in essence, relates to plaintiff’s claim that the findings are not supported by the evidence. We disagree. A review of the record shows that these findings and, hence, the judgment are supported by credible, substantial evidence.

Affirmed. Costs to plaintiffs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

607 P.2d 843, 1980 Utah LEXIS 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faatz-v-forsythe-utah-1980.