F. W. Stewart Manufacturing Corp. v. United States

67 Ct. Cl. 275, 7 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 9002, 1929 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 394, 1929 WL 2480
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedMarch 11, 1929
DocketNo. F-318
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 67 Ct. Cl. 275 (F. W. Stewart Manufacturing Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
F. W. Stewart Manufacturing Corp. v. United States, 67 Ct. Cl. 275, 7 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 9002, 1929 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 394, 1929 WL 2480 (cc 1929).

Opinion

[276]*276MEMORANDUM BT THE COURT

The only question in this case is whether speedometer-gears, drive chains, or flexible shafts, and flexible housings for such shafts, especially designed, manufactured, and sold for use on automobiles, and which were adapted for no other purpose or use, subjected plaintiff to liability for the payment of excise taxes under the provisions of section 900 of the revenue act of 1921, 42 Stat. 291, and section 600 of the-revenue act of 1924, 43 Stat. 322, which levy taxes on parts and accessories sold on or in connection with automobiles,, automobile trucks, and automobile wagons.

We think the articles in question were clearly subject to-the tax. It is a matter of common knowledge that no automobile is now made and sold in this country without a speedometer, and that owing to the speed regulations which universally prevail it would be difficult to operate an automobile without this device. In fact an automobile would not be complete without a speedometer.

[277]*277Martin Rocking Fifth Wheel Co. v. United States, 60 C. Cls. 466, is not an authority to the contrary. In that case the article sought to be taxed was not a part of the automobile, but merely a device used in connecting a trailer therewith. In fact, it in no way affected the operation of the automobile itself. The case is controlled by the decisions in Cole Storage Battery Co. v. United States, 65 C. Cls. 164, and Walker Mfg. Co. v. United States, 65 C. Cls. 394.

It follows that plaintiff’s petition must be dismissed. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Norman Industries, Inc. v. The United States
361 F.2d 992 (Court of Claims, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Ct. Cl. 275, 7 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 9002, 1929 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 394, 1929 WL 2480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/f-w-stewart-manufacturing-corp-v-united-states-cc-1929.