F. W. Myers & Co. v. United States
46 Cust. Ct. 546
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in F. W. Myers & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 Cust. Ct. 90 →
United States Customs Court·Decided June 19, 1961·No. No. 65821; protests 59/31713, 59/31717, and 60/7722 (Ogdensburg)·Published
Opinion
[547]*547Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items invoiced as “Mysoline, Mysoline Primidone or Primidone” are dutiable, as claimed, the protests were sustained accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
F. W. Myers & Co. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 546 (cusc 1961).
46 Cust. Ct. 546 (F. W. Myers & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.