F. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-1146V UNPUBLISHED

K.F., Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: January 7, 2022 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer; HUMAN SERVICES, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA)

Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner.

Julia Marter Collison, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On September 4, 2020, K.F. filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to her on October 12, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On November 19, 2021, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On January 7, 2022, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $129,977.05 (comprised of $127,500.00 in pain and suffering, $118.54 in unreimbursed expenses, and $2,358.51 in unreimbursed lost wages). Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent

1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $129,977.05 (comprised of $127,500.00 in pain suffering, $118.54 in unreimbursed expenses, and $2,358.51 in unreimbursed lost wages) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

K.F.,

Petitioner, No. 20-1146V Chief Special Master Corcoran v. ECF

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On September 4, 2020, K.F. (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation (“Petition”)

under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 34 (“Vaccine

Act” or “Act”), as amended. Petitioner alleges that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to

Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to

her on October 12, 2017. On November 12, 2021, respondent filed his Vaccine Rule 4(c) report,

recommending that compensation be awarded. On November 19, 2021, the Chief Special Master

issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation.

I. Items of Compensation

Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $127,500.00 in pain and suffering

damages, $118.54 in unreimbursed expenses, and $2,358.51 in unreimbursed lost wages. See 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and

the Court’s judgment award the following1: a lump sum payment of $129,977.05, representing

compensation for all elements of economic and noneconomic damages, in the form of a check

payable to petitioner, K.F.

III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment

Lump sum payable to petitioner, K.F. $129,977.05

Respectfully submitted,

BRIAN M. BOYNTON Acting Assistant Attorney General

C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

TRACI R. PATTON Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

/s/ Julia M. Collison JULIA M. COLLISON Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 305-0102 Julia.collison@usdoj.gov

Dated: January 7, 2022 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings and future pain and suffering. 2