F. V. Investments, N. V. v. Sicma Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

F. V. Investments, N. V. v. Sicma Corp.

415 So. 2d 755, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20128

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 18, 1982

DocketNo. 81-2421

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 415 So. 2d 755 (F. V. Investments, N. V. v. Sicma Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

F. V. Investments, N. V. v. Sicma Corp., 415 So. 2d 755, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20128 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The preliminary injunction issued pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(a) is reversed on two grounds. First, the acts enjoined by the injunction are not specified with such reasonable definiteness and certainty that the defendants bound by the decree would know what they must refrain from doing without the matter being left to speculation and conjecture. See Moore v. City Dry Cleaners & Laundry, Inc., 41 So.2d 865, 871 (Fla.1949). Secondly, the complaint for injunctive relief fails to set forth clearly, definitely, and unequivo[756]*756cally sufficient allegations to warrant the intervention of a court of equity. Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange County, 118 So.2d 541 (Fla.1960); Stanton v. Harris, 152 Fla. 736, 13 So.2d 17 (Fla.1943).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The preliminary injunction issued pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(a) is reversed on two grounds. First, the acts enjoined by the injunction are not specified with such reasonable definiteness and certainty that the defendants bound by the decree would know what they must refrain from doing without the matter being left to speculation and conjecture. See Moore v. City Dry Cleaners & Laundry, Inc., 41 So.2d 865, 871 (Fla.1949). Secondly, the complaint for injunctive relief fails to set forth clearly, definitely, and unequivo[756]*756cally sufficient allegations to warrant the intervention of a court of equity. Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange County, 118 So.2d 541 (Fla.1960); Stanton v. Harris, 152 Fla. 736, 13 So.2d 17 (Fla.1943).

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

415 So. 2d 755, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/f-v-investments-n-v-v-sicma-corp-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack