F. R. Patch Manufacturing Co. v. William A. Gahagan Co.

115 A. 926, 93 N.J. Eq. 223, 8 Stock. 223, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 283
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 30, 1921·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalis oil, Black, Katzenbach, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk — 14. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

F. R. Patch Manufacturing Co. v. William A. Gahagan Co., 115 A. 926, 93 N.J. Eq. 223, 8 Stock. 223, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 283 (N.J. 1921).

115 A. 926 (F. R. Patch Manufacturing Co. v. William A. Gahagan Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Uttinger v. Koopman
134 A.2d 824 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)