F. R. E., Inc. v. City of Boca Raton

283 So. 2d 48, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6580
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 15, 1973·No. No. 72-917·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff property owner filed an action challenging the validity of a zon[49] ing ordinance. The effort was rejected and we approve the findings and decision of the trial court and say that no reversible error has been demonstrated.

Additionally, we are of the opinion that the property owner had such notice and forewarning of the pending enactment of the ordinance, — coupled with the conduct of the owner, — as would prevent it from invoking equitable estoppel against the defendant City. See City of Ft. Lauderdale v. Lauderdale Industrial Sites, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 47; Sharrow v. City of Dania, Fla.1955, 83 So.2d 274.

Affirmed.

OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

F. R. E., Inc. v. City of Boca Raton, 283 So. 2d 48, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6580 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

283 So. 2d 48 (F. R. E., Inc. v. City of Boca Raton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whitehall Realty, Inc. v. City of Boca Raton
314 So. 2d 10 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
F. R. E., Inc. v. City of Boca Raton
290 So. 2d 492 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)