F. P. Sadowski Corp. v. Mow

131 So. 2d 3
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 8, 1961·No. No. 30725·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Writ of Certiorari was awarded and we have heard argument of attorneys for the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Petition is without merit, therefore, the Writ must be and is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed.

THOMAS, C. J., and DREW, THOR-NAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.' TERRELL, HOBSON and ROBERTS, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

F. P. Sadowski Corp. v. Mow, 131 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 1961).

131 So. 2d 3 (F. P. Sadowski Corp. v. Mow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gettinger v. Americana Hotel of Bal Harbour, Inc.
356 So. 2d 914 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Russo v. Clark
147 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1962)
Kraus v. Osteen
135 So. 2d 885 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Messina v. Baldi
135 So. 2d 17 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Clark v. Russo
133 So. 2d 764 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)