F. Murray Hill Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

F. Murray Hill Co. v. United States

5 Cust. Ct. 487, 1940 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3199

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 9, 1940

DocketNo. 4973; Entry Nos. 15918

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Cust. Ct. 487 (F. Murray Hill Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

F. Murray Hill Co. v. United States, 5 Cust. Ct. 487, 1940 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3199 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Cline, Judge:

These appeals, filed by the importer, request a reappraisement of certain glass atomizers, etc., imported from Japan. When the cases were called for trial, there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff, although due notice was given of the date and place of hearing. Counsel for the defendant made a motion to dismiss the appeals. As there is nothing in the record to overcome the pre-sump don of correctness attaching to the appraisements and there was a failure on the part of the plaintiff to establish all the elements necessary to enable the court to make an appraisement, the motion of counsel for the defendant is granted and the appeals are hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cline, Judge:

These appeals, filed by the importer, request a reappraisement of certain glass atomizers, etc., imported from Japan. When the cases were called for trial, there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff, although due notice was given of the date and place of hearing. Counsel for the defendant made a motion to dismiss the appeals. As there is nothing in the record to overcome the pre-sump don of correctness attaching to the appraisements and there was a failure on the part of the plaintiff to establish all the elements necessary to enable the court to make an appraisement, the motion of counsel for the defendant is granted and the appeals are hereby dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Cust. Ct. 487, 1940 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/f-murray-hill-co-v-united-states-cusc-1940.