F. Mansfield & Sons Co. v. Pausch
This text of 8 Conn. Supp. 402 (F. Mansfield & Sons Co. v. Pausch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The demurrer to a lone paragraph, viz;., paragraph 6, which does not of itself attempt to state a cause of action, is improperly pleaded. Practice Book (1934) §97.
So far as the demurrer to the prayer for relief is concerned, the more specific statement in conjunction with paragraph 6 adequately states a cause upon which such relief could be predicated. See, however, form 249 in connection with form 250, Practice Book (1934) pp. 215, 216.
In its present form, as to subdivision I of the demurrer, and at the present time, in view of such allegations as do ap' pear as to subdivision II, the demurrer is. overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Conn. Supp. 402, 1940 Conn. Super. LEXIS 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/f-mansfield-sons-co-v-pausch-connsuperct-1940.