F. K. B. A. Associates v. Irrizarry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

F. K. B. A. Associates v. Irrizarry

65 A.D.2d 688, 409 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13444

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 2, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 65 A.D.2d 688 (F. K. B. A. Associates v. Irrizarry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

F. K. B. A. Associates v. Irrizarry, 65 A.D.2d 688, 409 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13444 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 26, 1977, dismissed without costs or disbursements on the grounds that the order was subsumed in the subsequently entered order and judgment on the appeal from which the order has been reviewed. (CPLR 5501, subd [a], par 1.) Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 23, 1978, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Justice Schwartz, without costs or disbursements. We do not pass on the question of whether an action in contract would lie (see Matter of First Nat. City Bank v City of New York Fin. Admin., 36 NY2d 87). Concur—Birns, J. P., Silverman, Evans, Fein and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 26, 1977, dismissed without costs or disbursements on the grounds that the order was subsumed in the subsequently entered order and judgment on the appeal from which the order has been reviewed. (CPLR 5501, subd [a], par 1.) Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 23, 1978, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Justice Schwartz, without costs or disbursements. We do not pass on the question of whether an action in contract would lie (see Matter of First Nat. City Bank v City of New York Fin. Admin., 36 NY2d 87). Concur—Birns, J. P., Silverman, Evans, Fein and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.D.2d 688, 409 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/f-k-b-a-associates-v-irrizarry-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack