F. H. Harbin and B. E. Harbin v. Richard E. Butler

Sixth Circuit

F. H. Harbin and B. E. Harbin v. Richard E. Butler

185 F.2d 238, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3257

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedNovember 29, 1950

Docket11163

StatusPublished

This text of 185 F.2d 238 (F. H. Harbin and B. E. Harbin v. Richard E. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

F. H. Harbin and B. E. Harbin v. Richard E. Butler, 185 F.2d 238, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3257 (6th Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been duly heard and considered upon the record and upon the respective oral arguments and briefs of attorneys for the appellant and for the appellee ;

And it appearing that the judgment for the plaintiff, now appellee, on the verdict of the jury awarding him $5,000 damages, is supported by substantial evidence and that no error appears in the rulings of the-.District Court upon the trial.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been duly heard and considered upon the record and upon the respective oral arguments and briefs of attorneys for the appellant and for the appellee ;

And it appearing that the judgment for the plaintiff, now appellee, on the verdict of the jury awarding him $5,000 damages, is supported by substantial evidence and that no error appears in the rulings of the-.District Court upon the trial.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 F.2d 238, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/f-h-harbin-and-b-e-harbin-v-richard-e-butler-ca6-1950.